Question: Ask The Nuwaupians, Are The Tama-hu And Hyksos Caucasians/White People As Dr. York Claimed?

Answer: They'll have to say yes because it's in their doctrine.

During the latter part of the 1990's, Malachi York began teaching a new narrative on the origins of a people referred to as "Caucasians" or Europeans, the Tamahu.  In the first book York released mentioning and explaining the "Tamahu" (Let's Set The Records Straight) York attempts to connect the Olmecs of Meso-America to that of the Kemet (Egypt) and gives this odd claim on the origins of Caucasians/Europeans/White People. 

 

The misinformation begins with this question, "Are there any Historical beliefs on where the Olmec's came from?"

 

 This and York's definitions are all pseudo, but we'll come back to this later.  In a subsequent publication called (Jesus Found In Egipt) York writes the following.  

"Through Mizraim's migration from the land of Sumer to Tama-Re called Kemet or Kham (Kem), he encounters Canaanites and mixes his seed producing an offspring called Casluhim (Genesis 10:14), who gave birth to the Philistine, which bred the Palestinians (Genesis 10:14). Later these Philistinians or Palestinians produced lighter skinned straight haired, which is really not hair but fur, Heka Khasut 'Hyksos' "

-Malachi York: Jesus Found In Egipt pg. 311

 

"...There were also Tam'a-hu Israelites who were the Hyksos, commonly known as the Shepard Kings.  The Egiptians called them Heka Khasut..."

-Malachi York: Jesus Found In Egipt pg. 374

 

Certainly this is misinformation and demonstrates York's overt ignorance of ancient African history.  In order to fully DEBUNK York's claims regarding "Tamahu", a more substantive presentation with primary sources and context is necessary.  The above image depicting the "4" races can be found in Kemet (Egypt) on the walls of the tomb of Seti I, in an inscription called The Book of Gates, and within the Book of Gates, they have these four different ethnicities, four sets of four groups (16 figures).  This image is usually seen with just one figure from each of the 4 sets hence the 4 Races of mankind.    

 Inaccurate order of people was taken from Giovanni Battista "Egyptian Race Portrayed in the Book of Gates" (re-drawn)

 

 

 

The inscriptions called the Book of Gates which includs these 16 figures can also be found in the tombs of Merenptah I and Rameses III.

 

 

 A. B. C. D. are re-drawings from the tomb of Rameses III (KV 11) 1200 BC

 

 

Below is from the Primary Source in the Tomb of Seti I, the fifth hour (not re-drawn), although damaged, clearly it isn't just four people or races but 4 sets of 4. 

 

They referred to these four groups (inclusive of themselves) by their ethnic names.  Again, here's an example of the names and the distinction that the Egyptians made between themselves and "Foreigners".  

 

Above is the original from the Book of Gates in the tomb of Seti I followed by the same image re-drawn for clarity.  First we see Heru on the far left, in front of him are the first four individuals called Remetch.  Once again, when the Egyptians wanted to call themselves by a name to distinguish themselves from other nationalities, they called themselves "Remetch".  Remetch is an Ethnonym (a name they called themselves) as opposed to a Toponym, e.g. (place name, territory, Kingdom) and that would be /kmt/.

Remetch is clearly shown, evidence of this is seen in between each of the 4 individuals where we see the name Remetch spelled out completely! It's broken up in between all four figures.  They have, the open mouth, the tethering rope, the man crouched with arm slightly extended, the woman seated and the three strokes, collectively spelling the word for themselves, /rmt/ Remetch. 

  

 

 

The people in front of them are called /aAmw/ Aamew, the nomadic people of Western Asia/Desert dwellers who lived to the East and North-East of Egypt.  Now Dr. York (in keeping with Massey's misinformation) refers to the aAmu as "Hamu",

"...The 'Colored man' known as the Hamu in Egiptian science, and from the brown seed or the Hamu..."

This is false, in the word /aAmu/, there's no "H" sound used describing them thus it can't be found in the glyph.  Also, the use of the word "Hamu is a trick, the implication being "Ham-ites" or people of the bible "Ham" where he deceptively plays a phonetic game Kemet = Kham = Ham  hence "Ham-u" and that's bogus, the word in the text is /aAmu/.

 

 

 

Next to them are the people known as /nHsyw/ (Nehesyu - Remetch - Aamew - Tchemehew), the people living south of Kemet (Egypt), referred to today as "Nubians".   York incorrectly refers to them as "Nasi/Nahsu", here's the glyph from the text for them.

 

 

 

The fourth group are called /TmHw/ (Tchemehu), representing the people of Libya. 

 

 

The point being, when the Egyptians wanted to distinguish themselves from other nations or groups, they referred to themselves as Remetch.  The word Remetch comes from their Cosmogonical text, their Cosmological world view where they say, "they themselves" are from the emanations or tears of Ra.   "Tears" in Egyptian language is "Remy" thus the Egyptians themselves refered to themselves as the Remetch.

For evidence, the primary source for that is in the Book of Knowing the Transformations of Ra and Overthrowing of Apep.  Ernest Alfred Wallis Budges has a translation of this text in his book Egyptian Gods Volume 1 page 398.  

"...It will be noticed that ONLY the Egyptians, or offspring of Ra, are said to have been produced by the tears of Ra..."

-E. A. Wallis Budges: Egyptian Gods Volume 1 page 398

 

Remetch is easily seen in the Book of Gates.   In the tomb of Rameses III who ruled later,  and they have the same depiction and scene (Book of Gates) how they described themselves using the word Remetch, below are Primary Sources (KV11). 

 

Rameses III, in his tomb (KV11) was painted by the royal artists themselves and represented how the Remetch (ancient Egyptians) distinguished themselves from other nations in the area.  In the tomb of Seti they painted a reddish-brown hue, in the tomb of Rameses they used a darker hue.  The artist made their identity known by placing the word Remetch in front of the image in "A", any claims to the contrary, would be absurd.  Some would attempt to translate rmt to mean "people", but that would make no sense because we're viewing PEOPLE, and each group has a name identifying them.  

The 5th hour of the text simply reads, "Heru says to the herd of Ra who dwell in the Duat Kemet and the Deshret, transformation to you the herds of Ra, who have come into being by means of the Great one, formost of the heavens.  Let there be breath to your nostrils, releasing your mummy wrappings!  You all are the tears of my brilliant eye of my splendour in your name of Remetch!

Mighty of issue /aAmu/ you all have come into being in your name of aAmu; Sekhet has created them, and it is she who deliverd their souls.  I spit forth you, and I was content with the hundreds of thousands who came forth from me in your name of Nehesyu. Heru made them to come into being, and it is he who avenges their souls. I sought out mine Eye, and you came into being in your name of Tchemehu; Sekhet has created them, and she avengeth their souls."

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Tamahu~

 

Now regarding the misinformation taught by York and others on the "Tamahu" being "white people" Caucasians or Europeans, it should be noted that this ideology stems from one man, Gerald Massey who is apparently one of the "Masters who guides" York's pen. 

"...I call you to accept this truth as bestowed upon me by THE MASTERS who guide my pen, for of myself I could not have done the works of it."

-Malachi York: A Personal Note From The Receiver (The Holy Tablets)

 

 In his book "A Book of the Beginnings" on page 27, Massey incorrectly identifies one of the four nations represented in the tomb of Seti I, in the Book of Gates /TmHw/ "Tchemehu", those of Libya.   Massey, disingenuously created a new pronunciation and definition for Tchemehu referring to them as Tamahu (created whites).  Earlier we read where York claimed that Tama to meant "people and created",

"In Egiptian Tama means 'people and created', Hu is 'white, light, Ivory'.  The Tama-hu are the created white people..."

-Malachi York: Let's Set The Records Straight pg. 33

 

This is all the misinformation taken word for word from Gerald Massey's book "A Book of the Beginnings".

There it is folks, York's misinformation source, Gerald Massey.  York knew no better because he was totally illiterate in Egyptian language, and by default Egyptian culture.  So York was perpetrating a fraud having the people believe he was so smart.  The word isn't even pronounced Tam-a-hu or Tam-hu, it's transliterated as /TmHw/, which would be Tchemehew, and they were the Western neighbors of the Remetch (Egyptians) as the Book of Gates in the tomb of Seti I indicates.   Tamahu is a misnomer, and corruption of/TmHw, Tchemehu pure and simple.

 

Above is a nation of people the Remetch (Egyptians) called, Tchemehu, "Libyans", another group of Libiyans were called, Tchehenu, groups living in Upper Libya and Lower Libya which is to the West of Kemet.  Just as Kemet had an Upper Kemet and Lower Kemet, likewise did Libya, take a look.

 

The above map is from Brush's Geographical Inscriptions of Ancient Egyptian Monuments (Volume 2).  It shows the two major divisions of Libyans /TmHw/ and /Thnw/ West of Kemet.  

 

 

 

Based on these images resembling "white people" or white skin, this appearance has become confused, intentionally or by accident with the word /tA mHw/.  Above are Ethnic groups also taken from Brush's Geographical Inscriptions of Ancient Egyptian Monuments (Volume 2).  It should come as no surprise that York did no research into who these people were, if he did, he would have known that not all of them looked the same.  Let's take for example the image below taken from the book History of Egypt, Chaldea, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 4 by Maspero.  Clearly these people can possibly pass for Remetch in features alone, but why don't we these representations?  

 

 

 Below is the primary source featuring the War Dance of the Tchemehu.  The location where this can be seen is in Dayr Al-Bahri near Thebes in Hatshepsut's mortuary temple on the west bank of the Nile.

 

Why didn't Massey or York mention these Libyans?  They're wearing the familiar feathers, the activity is literally mentioned by the Remetch (Egyptians) and says, /ibw in TmHw/ translated as, "Dances by the Tchemehew".  In Sesh Medew Netcher (written Egyptian language) in between the figures were see their name /TmHu/, 

/TmHw/ is spelled two ways, with or without the 3 strokes.  The tethering rope is /T/ = "TCH", the next is /mH/, the quail chick is /w/ and together it's /TmHw/ Tchemehu.  The other, instead of the tethering rope, it uses the U33 Pestle Glyph which is /T/ give "TCH" in the word. 

 

The three strokes identified plural (they/them) and the bent stick (T14) represents foreign people or nation, in this case Tchemehu.  

 

 The point being, Jean Champollion, Gerald Massey and others were absolutely wrong in their assessment that the Libyans were of European stock/Caucasian/White/Aryan, and by default Malachi York is wrong because he relied on Massey.  Now certainly there were light and dark Tchemehu, just as there were light and darker skined Remetch (Egyptians) and this is well documented in the following.

 

 

Now in the above image of /TmHw/ (Libyan), we see the traditional depiction with TATTOOS or some other skin carving.  That's something you'd have to look closer rather than at a glance.  If you look at the first image, it's a bit faded, so you would have to zoom in and adjust the clarity.  Obviously the Remetch chose to depict these people in their natural complexion, not white as Champollion's drawings illustrate (which is due to water damaged areas) his re-drawings has brought about this confusion.

 

 

The above image is used by white supremacist and other misinformed people without giving any context as to where they come from.  There are three different depictions from three different locations.  The left image is from Rameses III tomb 5th hour of the Book of Gates.  The center image is from a tile in the Sanctuary of Rameses III, and the right image is from the tomb of Seti I, a redrawing of the damaged first /TmHw/ Libyan, again, none of them are Europeans. 

 

 

As stated before, somehow the word /TmHw/ Tchemehu (Libyans) got confused with the word for a region in Lower Kemet (Egypt) /tA mHw/ Ta-Mehu.  Lower Kemet was known as Ta-Mehu (land of papyrus) here's the glyph indicating this.    

  

 

 

Because of York trusting in the pseudoism of Gerald Massey and his claims that Tamahu meant "created white people", he (York) has magnified and promoted this deception.  If he truly knew the language of the Remetch (Egyptians), then he could have easily debunked the claims of Massey, one of the "Masters" who guided his pen, in other words, one of the authors he trusted, relied upon and used the works of.  So when York and the Nuwaupians uses the word tA mHw "Tamahu" as a description for "white people", they're making fools of themselves publicly because they would be calling the people of lower Kemet (Egypt) "white people" and that's totally ridiculous.  Below you can see how York took Massey's claims word for word and added them to his book, not even indicating for his readers Massey's words from his own (plagiarism).

 

 

 

In York's continued deception and/or ignorance, he even claimed that the /aAmw/, the nomadic people of Western Asia were the Hyksos!  No linguistic support, just the old pseudoscience of  "It Looks Like, So It Must Be".

In York's book "Jesus Found In Egipt", he maliciously rearranges the order of people to Nubuns = Nehesew, Nubians = Remetch, Aamew = Hyksos, Tchemehew = Hittites,  that's deception.  The names York gives to the 4 nations from the tomb of Seti I the Book of Gates DO NOT match what the Egyptians wrote and described.  Nubuns are not mentioned, Nubian isn't mentioned, Hyksos isn't mentioned, neither were Hittites.  This literary misinformation for profit must stop!  

 

 

 

York's claim here is ridiculous and flat out wrong.  /HqA xAs.wt/ "ruler of foreign territories" is a title for those who came from among the /aAmw/ "Asiatics".  Before that it was a title for the /nHsy/ rulers, known today as Nubians.  So the original Heka Khasut  "Hyksos" were "Nubians/Negroes/Blacks" and evidence of this can be found in the Egyptian text of the Autobiography of Weni, the primary source is located in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, Egypt.  It gives a list of the names of 5 foreign rulers of Nehesew.  The same word used for "foreigners" /HqA xAs.wt/ is there, where you get the word Hyksos, and this can be seen in lower line of 46.  For the English translation, get the book by James Henry Breasted "Ancient Records of Egypt Part 1" section 293.

"His majesty made war on the Asiantic Sand-dwellers and his majesty made an army of many ten thousands; in the entire South, southward to Elephantine, and northward to Aphroditopolis; in the North land on both sides entire in the [stronghold], and in the midst of the [strongholds], among the Irthet Negroes, the Mazoi Negroes, the Yam Negroes, among the Wawat Negroes, among the Kau Negroes, and in the land of Temeh... His majesty sent [me] to dig five canals in the South and to make 3 cargo-boats and 4 [tow]-boats of acacia wood of Wawat... [lower lines 46]  ...Then the Negro Chiefs of Irthet, Wawat, Yam and Mazoi drew timber therefore, and I did the whole in only one year..." 

-Inscription of Weni: James Henry Breasted: Ancient Records of Egypt Part 1 ss 293ff 

 

The term "Negro" is the word for Nubian which is /nHsy/ and /HqA xAs.wt/ Nubian rulers of foreign territories.  According to the text /HqA xAs.wt/ or "Hyksos" is mentioned in conjunction with the nHsy ruler Irtet, /HqA xAs.wt/ + /Irtjet/.  In the inscription of Weni, it's used to describe not only the Negro rulers of Irtet, but also of Mazoi, Wawet, Yam, and Medja , a term used by the Remetch a very long time ago, going as far back as 2000 BC in the Old Kingdom under Pepi I.

 

So what's the root of this white people being Tama-hu? Well the roots goes back to a man named Jean F. Champoliion, and in a letter he wrote, he makes the following claims. 

 

"...Right in the valley of Biban-el-Moluk we admired, like all previous visitors, the astonishing freshness of the paintings and the fine sculptures on several tombs. I had a copy made of the peoples represented on the bas-reliefs. At first I had thought from the copies of these bas-reliefs published in England, that these peoples of different races led by the god Horus holding his shepherd's staff, were indeed nations subject to the rule of the Pharaohs. A study of the legends informed me that this tableau has a more general meaning. It portrays the third hour of the day, when the sun is beginning to turn on its burning rays, warming all the inhabited countries of our hemisphere. According to the legend itself, they wished to represent the inhabitants of Egypt and those of foreign lands. Thus we have before our eyes the image of the various races of man known to the Egyptians.And we learn at the same time the great geographical or ethnographica divisions established during that early epoch. Men led by Horus, the shepherd of the peoples, belong to four distinct families. The first, the one closest to the god, has a dark red colour, a well-proportioned body, kind face, nose slightly aquiline, long braided hair, and is dressed in white. The legends designate this species as Rt-en-ne-Rme, the race of men par excellence i.e. the Egyptians.They can be no uncertainty about the racial identity of the man who comes next: he belongs to the Black race, designated under the general term, Nahasi. The third presents a very different aspect; his skin colour borders on yellow or tan, he has a strongly aquiline nose, thick, black pointed beard and wears a short garment of varied colours; these are called, Namou. Finally, the last one is what we call flesh-coloured, a white skin of the most delicate shade, a nose straight or slightly arched, blue eyes, blond or reddish beard, tall stature and very slender clad in a hairy ox-skin, a veritable savage tattooed [see my article on European Goths] on various parts of his body, he is called, Tamahou.I hasten to seek the tableau corresponding to this one in the other royal tombs and, as a matter of fact, I found it in several. The variations I observed fully convinced me that they had tried to represent here the inhabitants of the four corners of the earth, according to the Egyptian system, namely; The inhabitants of Egypt which, by itself formed one part of the world The inhabitants of Africa proper: Blacks Asians Finally [and I am ashamed to say so, since our race is the last and the most savage in the series]. Europeans who, in those remote epochs, frankly did not cut too fine a figure in the world. In this category we must include all blonds and white-skinned people living not only in Europe, but Asia as well, their starting point. This manner of viewing the tableau is all the more accurate because, on the other tombs, the same generic names appear, always in the same order. We find there, Egyptians and Africans represented in the same way, which could not be otherwise; but the Namou [the Asians] and the Tamahou [Europeans] present significant and curious variants. Instead of the Arab or the Jew, dressed simply and represented on one tomb, Asian's representatives on other tombs [those of Ramases 11 ect] are three individuals, tanned complexion, aquiline nose, black eyes, and thick beard but clad in rare splendour.In one, they are evidently Assyrians, their costume, down to the smallest detail, is identical with that of personages engraved on Assyrian cylinders. In the other, are Medes or early inhabitants of some part of Persia. Their physiognomy and dress resemble, feature for feature, those found on monuments called, Persepolitan. Thus, Asia was represented indiscriminately by any one of the peoples who inhabited it. The same is true of our good old ancestors, the Tamahou. Their attire is sometimes different; their heads are more or less hairy and adorned with various ornaments; their savage dress varies somewhat in form, but their white complexion, their eyes and beard all preserve the character of a race apart. I had this strange ethnographical series copied and coloured. I certainly did not expect, on arriving at Biban-el-Moluk, to find sculptures that could serve as vignettes for the history of the primitive Europeans, if ever one has the courage to attempt it, nevertheless, there is something flattering and consoling in seeming them, since they make us appreciate the progress we have subsequently achieved..."

-Jean Champolion: Letters to his brother?

Now clearly from what's been presented earlier, there is no possible way the Libyans were white.  Scholars have since corrected Champollion on this poor interpretation, yet Champollion says, 

"...blue eyes, blond or reddish beard...In this category we must include all blonds and white-skinned people living not only in Europe, but Asia as well, their starting point..."

 

In viewing the primary source of Seti I, there is NO blond haired blue eyed Tchemehu "Libyans".  We don't even see a blonde in Champollion's own are work, so who is he trying to fool?!

 

Below is another redrawing of the damaged area of the Book of Gates in the tomb of Seti I, found in the book, Brusch's Geographical Inscriptions of Ancient Egyptian Monuments (Volume 2) and notice, NO blonde there either.

 

Now let's see the DECEPTION of Champollion.  He's presenting an artistic RE-DRAWN representation of what's in the tomb of Seti I and we see individuals that are not part of the four sets of four depicting the four "Races".  Obviously Jean Champollion was lying to his brother in that letter about seeing blonde haired blue eyed Libyans, thus he's untrustworthy in this regards.

  

Here's a very important point that should be singled out.  The images of the Tchemehu (Tamahu) are faded, due to water damage, now notice how they give drawings as the source and not the work of the primary sources, in other words, they'll show you the light faded images to leave the impression in your mind that they were white people, yet will ignore other images of the Tchemehu to hold that one belief.  In examining the four Tchemehu (Libyans), you can clearly see the brownish hue form the parts undamaged, yet they do not illustrate that fact.

Even the second Tchemehu on his right side, the color is not as faded as the left side of his body, why don't they ever show that portion?  So clearly this is their attempt at writing their way into Africa (albeit by making themselves look like savages who would rise to supremacy) They somehow mysteriously popped up as Libyans, living West of Kemet based on the RE-DRAWINGS then ultimately claiming to be the original Remetch (Egyptians) just take notice of how Champollion changes the hue of both the Remetch and  Nehesew, that's how it's done, but the primary sources and language refutes that argument.  

 

Taken from the tomb of Rameses III Festival of Min where we see the /TmHw/ Tchemehu (Libyans)

 

 

In conclusion, white people are NOT mentioned in any of the ancient texts.  There is no racial term used to describe Europeans/whites/Caucasians among the Remetch, its a modern classification construct.  York was totally wrong on this issue, and also explains why York is wrong on practically everything else he's ever written or said about Kemet (Egypt).  York was a "Useful Idiot", helping to spread this sort of misinformation.  Neither his spoken words nor his writings can be trusted, making everything he's taught suspect even the ridiculously pseudo publications being released today, the so-called "Actual Facts" or Paa Taraq.  His followers will not check for clarity, instead they continue to parrot the lies and idiotic teachings of Malachi York.

 

A special thank you goes out to Wudjau Men-Ib Iry-Maat for inspiring and contributing to this article.  Visit https://sebauniversity.com/ and sign up for courses on learning Sesh Medew Netcher, the ancient Egyptian language.