Question: Ask The Nuwaupians, Why Does Malachi York Make All Nuwaupians Look Like Absolute Retards When They Quote Him As Their Source?
Answer: Anyone who knows Nuwaupian doctrine can and will make ANY Nuwaupian look stupid or crazy by simply pulling out York's words.
One thing that's universally accepted by individuals who may have confronted members of the Nuwaupian cult, and that is, the cult member's consistent use of citing Malachi York as the source of their information, or in other words, they will quote York's books and/or lectures regarding religion, linguistics, biology, astronomy etc. However, when a Nuwaupian is in dialogue with someone deeply familiar with the teachings of York, and are skeptical regarding the truthfulness thereof, e.g. York's flawed logic, inconsistent positions on what he believes, his religious stances or his lack of producing primary sources to substantiate his own claims; one who's knowledgeable of this can and will use the Nuwaupian's ignorance against them by also quoting York. Demonstrating publicly the Nuwaupian's inability to "show and prove" or support York's doctrine when challenged to procuce the facts.
So in keeping with the title of this article "Why Does Malachi York Make All Nuwaupians Look Like Absolute Retards When They Quote Him As Their Source?", I'll give three examples of Malachi York's strange and faulty claims, specifically his ever changing conflicting, contradicting and inconsistent positions on theology with special regards to the biblical character "Jesus" of 2000 years ago.
On social media (Facebook/Youtube) and the likes, we find numerous radical and obnoxious Latter-Day Nuwaupians, often trolling followers of other traditions in an effort to debunk or "expose" those traditions (religions) as false, misleading, contradictory or historically unfounded and inaccurate statements, hoping to protray York as being the wisest one. Yet the Nuwaupians who takes on this sort of overzealous activity, are made to look like fools should the recipients of that aggression pulls out York's instances, or false, misleading, contradictory, historically unfounded and inaccurate statements that are found in his books, audio and video lectures.
Example 1
Case and point, there's a Latter-Day Nuwaupian (a convert to York's religion post 2002 arrest) calling himself Khonsu Amun Min RE who has taken it upon himself to aggressively and disrespectfully attack anyone with oppositional theological beliefs regarding the bible or Egypt in general. This Khonsu person (who pops up from time to time) issued the following public challenge to Ron Shields A/K/A Divine Prospect on Ron's own Facebook page in early 2019.
<< Ron to prove to me by way of archaeology that any of your biblical fictitious prophets ever walked this earth. >>
That type of vitriol is indicative of how "Khonsu" launches his rants. The following is a demonstration of a Boomerang Dagger to the gut of a Khonsu, or any irritating Nuwaupian cult member. The same question they may ask, can easily be applied in the reverse very effectively,
"Khonsu, prove to us by way of archaeology that Malachi York was from the planet Rizq, and how could the biblical fictitious prophets Jesus and Enoch be taken to this planet Rizq?"
This is a question the Latter-Day Nuwaupian would not anticipate, and it's a valid question because Malachi York is on record making that exact claim.
"Whenever humans are brought to RIZQ, they are put in a biosphere like Enoch and Jesus (who was 1/2 human and 1/2 RIZQIYIAN)..."
-Malachi York: Man From Planet Rizq pg. 106
When questioned on this, the individual Nuwaupian would have to substantiate York's claims by way of evidence, be it archaeological, historically documented, or physical evidence, all the while holding York to his own words. For example, York says this about not producing evidence,
"They make statements about events and time, but they don't produce the evidence, or the document to support what they say, which leaves the reader in the same state they are in religion, to believe, but NOT have facts"
-Malachi York: Let's Set the Records Straight pg. 239
If Malachi York really wanted to produce evidence that he was from another planet, a simple sample of space dust or a rock from Rizq would have sufficed. So in asking Ron Shields the question, "prove to me by way of archaeology that any of your biblical fictitious prophets ever walked this earth", to this day York has never proven that he was from a planet called Rizq, let alone proven that "Jesus" and "Enoch" were taken there and housed in a Biosphere, a totally ridiculous argument on it's face.
"...Let me tell you right now, you won't find any Jesus of your bible being mentioned in there, he simply DIDN'T EXIST."
-Malachi York: The Degree Of Muhammad-ism pg. 4
"...there's no historical facts ANYWHERE that there was a man named Jesus 2000 years ago, there's NO FACTS..."
-Malachi York: End Of Racism (audio)
"...there has been NO REAL evidence that supports that a Jesus, as taught to be Christ and all of it's stories were ever proven to exist. No man has been recorded to have lived that life style and died..."
-Malachi York: Is Jesus God? pg. 2
This same Jesus of 2000 years ago who York says didn't exist, is one of the eight personalities that York also claims to speak to and through him to give you instructions and information.
"These personalities accompany other beings that speak to me ...Isa Al Masih: He is referred to as Y'sha, also known as Jesus the Messiah from 2,000 years ago He was merely a student of very great learned men which I have indicated in many of my books."
-Malachi York: Man Of Miracles In This Day And Time Part 1 pg. 24
This is an excellent example of York's inconsistent statements which leaves the Latter-Day Nuwaupians dumbfounded. How could Jesus of 2000 years ago have spoken to and through York, hung out in a biosphere with Enoch on York's planet yet not have existed? You see, when a Nuwaupian attempts to set someone up for the throat cut, they inadvertently suffer a self induced dagger to the chest as a result.
"...These personalities accompany other beings that speak to me ...Isa Al Masih: He is referred to as Ysha, also known as Jesus the Messiah from 2,000 years ago He was merely a student of very great learned men which I have indicated in many of my books..."
-Malachi York: Man Of Miracles In This Day And Time Part 1 pg. 24
1987
versus
"...there's no historical facts ANYWHERE that there was a man named Jesus 2000 years ago, there's NO FACTS..."
-Malachi York: End Of Racism (audio)
1998
versus
"...what better way to eliminate Ha Mashiakh, Al Masih, the Messiah than to make one think that he does not exist. Well, he does. THE YASHU'A, ISA, HARU, TAMMUZ, JESUS OF 2000 YEARS AGO IS REAL. HE'S REAL!!! "
-Is it Black Man's Christianity or White Man's Christianity? pg. 359
2001
Apparently York had a relapse and reconverted to Christianity as we see from the above and below assertions. Keep in mind that this is all AFTER the rhetoric and claims of Christianity being one of the so-called schools.
"...Pops told us that, and when Pops comes and says, NOW IT'S TIME TO TURN TO JESUS CHRIST...I wanna get some fine details all of a sudden Pops..."
-Malachi York: You Want To Question Me And I Taught You? (audio) 2002
"...because you didn't get the holy ghost, you don't know what it means to get the holy ghost and be saved, ain't my fault (inaudible) you think you got a monopoly on knowledge and I'm the one who taught you niggah...I'm happy that Christ found favor in me...God don't exist, all that sounds good for whole bunch of demons who want to hear that, and that's what frightens me, you know what frightened me, I realized over a period of time the doctrine I taught I was growing weeds, because I was teaching the bible is wrong, and this is wrong and that is wrong... and the reason why they they liked that doctrine so much is because they're demons, and when you start talking about Christ and salvation and Resurrection and the spirit of God and the glory of God, they get mad a me..."
"...you don't decide to get saved, Dr. Malachi Z. York didn't decide to become a Christian or to get saved, I was quite content in Egyptology, I knew what I was talking about...when God chooses you, I don't care where you at, I don't care what you doing...if God chose you..and something hit's you like bam!.. then you hear yourself saying, Jesus is real..."
"...if you understand what I'm saying and the person standing next to you thinks this is some kind of joke, you better get on away from that person...I'm talking about the power of God transforming your life, you may not believe it, you may not believe it cause I would have told you last year get out of my face with that crap...but when it got down to the reality of it all, everybody here is going to stand at the door of death, I want to ask you a simply question, what do you got to loose or gain right now, some of you don't believe that Jesus Christ is your personal savior, right, but if you did accept him, how would it change your life for the worst?
-Malachi York: You Want to Question Me, and I Taught You! 2002
The video below is an audio of York telling Nuwaupians that they should be in the "body of Christ".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLBgNaCcx-0
This is what the Nuwaupians believed towards the end of York's reign, circa 2002.
Now the confused and embarrassed Nuwaupian who daggered himself is trapped, and needs to explain to Ron Shields by way of archaeology, how Malachi York was from a planet called Rizq and how these existing/non-existing biblical fictitious prophets, Jesus and Enoch got to Rizq? The Nuwaupian has to be able to "show and prove" via research methodologies, because York said this,
"In a Nuwaupian’s eyes, there is nothing that you can’t find, but you must do research. Then and only then will you not be fooled by fools."
-Malachi York: The Holy Tabernacle Family Guide
Example: 2
This same reckless Latter-Day Nuwaupian "Khonsu" felt he had what it would take to challenge and debunk the articles on the website (Nuwaupianism.com) again, inflicting a reverse dagger to the chest.
<< Chuck Morgan says that Dr York is crazy for saying that the Bat is a grafting of the Rat and Bird, which makes logical sense >>
-Khonsu Amun Min RE: The Nuwaupianism.com Discussion Group Facebook 09/06/2019
That makes logical sense?, certainly a York follower would believe in this type of weird Pseudoscience if it's from York, saying that it makes logical sense. Anyone holding the belief that a bird had sex with a rat to produce bats is as bat-crazy or stupid as York was making the comment.
https://nuwaupianism.com/360-questions/wrong-knowledge/400-ask-the-nuwaupians-about-that-bat-question
This question came about because York challenged all bible believers, particularly Christians and Hebrew Israelites to support an error in York's words, regarding Leviticus 11:13-19 and Deuteronomy 14:11-18, which classifies the bat as a fowl (bird), however if the Christian or Hebrew Israelite knew York's doctrine well enough, they would just simply cite York's odd position on the origins of bats.
"...the bat is a RAT-LIKE mammal with wings. The bat is the results of the MATING of the BIRD (which accounts for the wings) and the RAT
(which accounts for the appearance of it's body).
-Malachi York: The Dog pg. 23
Because this Latter-Day Nuwaupian "Khonsu" was out skilled and out matched, he even started to doubt that York even wrote that a bird/rat produced bats. Having that reaction of doubt in the face of overwhelming evidence is what a person does when they can't face the reality that their faith has been crushed in realtime, so they'll make up excuses to compensate for the feelings of discontent, or in other words, Cognitive Dissonance takes over.
<< I'm double checking to see if the book really says that or not... show the book... I can't find it on scribd I think you photo shopped that >>
If denying the the facts won't work, he'll blatantly lie hoping that would work rather than either saying that York was wrong or offering evidence in York defense.
<< York did give evidence just not in a book, he did teach classes and gave mouth to ear information, you just never got any >>
Naturally when asked, "Khonsu" gave no proof of York ever lecturing on the biological makeup of the bat, let alone a "mouth to ear" in depth analysis of birds mating with rats to produce bats. Extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence, and York offered his readers none, nothing in support of such an out of this world claim (no pun intended). So when the Nuwaupian neophyte felt he could explain York's claim, he, like York gave no evidence, rather, he commited a number of logical fallacies, on most notable was the logical fallacy of Appealing to Ignorance. This fallacy occurs when Nuwaupians or any individual argues that the conclusion must be true because there exists no evidence against it. This fallacy cleverly and wrongly wrongly shifts the burden of proof away from the person making the claim, on to the skeptic questioning the claim.
"usually one who makes an assertion must assume the responsibility of defending it. If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed."
-Michalos, Alex (1969) Principles of Logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. p. 370.
The Burden of Proof
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KayBys8gaJY
Example:
The Claimant- says, a leaf weights 8 million pounds and pumps gas in a red Jeep on the planet Mars in June, prove it wrong.
The Skeptic- says, it hold no logical basis in reality, and you offer no evidence.
The Claimant- then says, well if you can't prove it wrong, it has to be true.
That's exactly what the Latter-Day Nuwaupian "Khonsu" stated in all capital letters when asked for evidence of the Nuwaupian belief that birds are mating with rats, producing baby bats.
<< IF YOU CANT PROVE HIM WRONG THEN TECHNICALLY HE IS RIGHT! >>
And there you have it, no evidence is required for such a strange belief, just believe it. In addition to appealing to ignorance, Khonsu now contradicts the very man he calls his master teacher.
"They make statements about events and time, but they don't produce the evidence, or the document to support what they say, which leaves the reader in the same state they are in religion, to believe, but NOT have facts"
-Malachi York: Let's Set the Records Straight pg. 239
"...You Need The Facts. You Need Your Leaders To Do Research And To Back Up Everything They Say With Documents, Not Just Words That Sound Good. Make Them Produce Documents To Prove It With Ancient Documents, Pictures, Slabs, Tablets, Carvings, Engravings, Records, Documents, And Scriptures. You'll Find In Most Cases They Can't Do It."
-Malachi York: Let's Set The Record Straight pages 2-3
This is yet another case of York leaving a follower looking like an absolute retard for not applying rigorous due diligence. His parting words to me on this bat issue that he stepped into were,
"Regardless of what the book says makes no difference to me, I MYSELF don't know the origin so I don't teach it, York does, not me! If he was here he would debate you and not me, I'm not a 'yorkie' get some rest champ 100%."
-Khonsu Amun Min RE: The Nuwaupianism.com Discussion Group Facebook 09/06/2019
Let this be known; Malachi York would not debate me on any of the issues regarding his errors, inconsistencies and deceptions, for no reason other than it would bring unnecessary attention and focus on the evidence supplied, thus it would not be in the best interest of York to engage in such a debate.
Example: 3
Enoch of the bible, also known as Adafa.
As demonstrated earlier in York's doctrine, he and Jesus Christ likes to hang out togethers on different planets, real or imaginary. Remember when Khonsu put the question to Ron Shields,
<< Ron to prove to me by way of archaeology that any of your biblical fictitious prophets ever walked this earth. >>
This line of questioning yielded bad results for Khonsu and Nuwaupians of like-mind. Yet he tried to pull this tactic off in another Facebook group, "Amen Ra Squad Scholarship" and the same level of shameful embarrassment took shape with his next question. But first, keep in mind that it's York's teachings that has Nuwaupians looking like retards, a statement made so eloquently by the renegade Latter-Day Nuwaupian himself.
<< you are a disgruntled ex member who uses York's own methodology against him by pointing out the same crap trying to make him look bad (case, plagirism, aliens...what Chuck Morgan does is skillfully and manipulativly pick and chooses from a small portion of Nuwaupian doctrine and tries to make us look like absolute retards >>
If that's the case, then York has made it that much easier to depict you people as absolute retards. It's not difficult, all anyone has to do is take from York's body of literature and lectures that make up the Nuwaupian doctrine, and show how stupid, flawed and pseudo it is, something I apparently use effectively, and it's demonstrated and documented at Nuwaupianism.com.
<< Who built the Giza Pyramids and when? >>
Obviously it's a rhetorical question, born not out of a sincere quest for knowing, but as another set up, a "gotcha" moment, hoping to spray daggers at anyone whose comments are not inline with what York claimed. And in doing so he yet again inflicts damage to himself thanks to York, a set of boomerang daggers to the head and chest. Let's look at what the so-called "Master-Teacher" teaches on who built the pyramids and why.
"The great pyramid of Giza which was attributed to Khufu because he reconstructed it was called Ekhet Khufu (horizon of Khufu) by the ancient Moors/Kemites of Ptah. Originally Adafa, also known as Enoch, erected this pyramid with the help of the Anunnaqis. Upon their request, Adafa BUILT THE GREAT PYRAMID OF GIZA to store the secret tablets of the elder, who was Adafa's closest companion."
-Malachi York: Ancient Egypt and the Pharaohs (1996)
"The 3 pyramids of Giza were originally built by Adafa, with the help of EXTRATERRESTRIAL BEINGS. Adafa was in tune with celestial beings that originally erected the pyramids. They are visitors from other galaxies."
-Malachi York: The Holy Tablets pg. 312 (1996)
The above quotes were taken from books where York informs the reader that,
"I call you to accept this truth as bestowed upon me by the masters who guide my pen..."
-Malachi York: The Holy Tablets - A Personal Note From The Receiver (1996)
"...you now have EVERYTHING you need to go to the next level. I came giving you what you wanted, Islam, so you would learn to want what I really have to give, NOW you have learned to want what I have to give."
-Malachi York: Holy Tablets Chapter 19 Tablet 6:184-194 (1996)
His pyramid statements are void of evidence, something he's stated over and over that one must supply or it amounts to a lie.
"Different Types of Lies:
1. White lie - defined as a diplomatic or well-intentioned untruth.
2. Fib - defined as an inconsequential lie
3. Tale - a deliberate lie or a falsehood.
4. Gossip - Trifling, often groundless rumor, usually of a personal, sensational or intimate nature; idle talk (2) a person who habitually engages in such talk.
5. Fables - Legendary stories; unverified stories, unverified means not substantiated; NOT PROVEN TO BE TRUE. To tell a fable means to narrate something as if it were true. Note that the key words in the previous sentence are 'as if they were true', which means that it ISN'T TRUE.
6. Story - A narrative, usually fictional, that is intended to amuse the reader or hearer. A story can also be called a tale. In other words a story IS A LIE that is TOLD WITH STYLE.
7. Hoax - (1) To TRICK INTO BELIEVING or accepting as genuine, something FALSE and often PREPOSTEROUS. (2) An act intended to TRICK OR DUPE; imposter, something accepted by fraud or fabrication."
-Malachi York: The Significance Of A Lie pg. 21-32
York always seems to reveal his true actions and intentions (but that's for another article). The elephant in the room was being ignored by the Latter-Day Nuwaupian Khonsu, which is the biblical character Enoch A/K/A/ Adafa. Yes you've read it right, Malachi York, leader of the Nuwaupian cult states in his books that the biblical Enoch was the true builder of the pyramids of Giza, Enoch and his friends the Extraterrestrials.
"The great pyramid of Giza which was attributed to Khufu because he reconstructed it was called Ekhet Khufu (horizon of Khufu) by the ancient Moors/Kemites of Ptah. Originally Adafa, also known as Enoch, erected this pyramid with the help of the Anunnaqis. Upon their request, Adafa BUILT THE GREAT PYRAMID OF GIZA to store the secret tablets of the elder, who was Adafa's closest companion."
-Malachi York: Ancient Egypt and the Pharaohs (1996)
So when Khonsu asked the question hoping to cut someone, he daggerd himself by way of York's words, a series of comedic pseudo nonsense, thus anyone knowing York's doctrine can use it against them as a demonstration of how York makes his followers look like "absolute retards" when ever they quote him.
Remember the question to Ron Shields (Divine Prospect) earlier, << Ron to prove to me by way of archaeology that any of your biblical fictitious prophets ever walked this earth. >> just re-apply the question to Khonsu or any members of the Latter-Day Nuwaupian cult, but with slight alterations, it knocks them out the water every time.
"Prove to me by way of archaeology that your biblical fictitious prophet Enoch ever walked this earth and built the pyramids of Giza with the help of Extraterrestrials?"
To watch and hear Khonsu and I go at it, simply click on the link,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpCn5kKepJM&t=1s
