Question: Ask The Nuwaupians, What Ever Happened to the Sumerian Bible, and the Sumerian Torah that York Failed to Release?

Answer: The Latter-Day Nuwaupians wouldn't have a clue.

While York was still spreading his version of ancient "Egiptian" teachings, he was also working behind the scene to release two books that were to be epic dictionaries on Sumerian language and culture called: The Sumerian Torah and The Sumerian Bible. This was all prior to his 2002 arrest. There was usually a book list included that even though they were listed, they never went to print. i.e.; 

-Is York Jesus The Real Jesus?

-Did A Man-God, named Jesus Ever Exist?

-Who are The Egiptians in the Bible?

-What Did Jesus Say?

-The Unmasked Scroll of ENQIME (Enoch)

-The Sumerian Torah

-The Sumerian Bible

These ads were at best; teasers, most notable in the last book York released prior to his arrest called; Is Jesus GOD? (revised edition 2002).

Here's a few examples: 

"And EN-NIN.MAH of INA-ANUN.NA.QI uncovered from the ground a sacred dwelling, a bright crystal city, and caused every kind of GIS, tree to grow that has flowers, fruits of the red carnelian of lust, with the vibe hanging from it, which is desirous to look at; the blue SU.ZA.GIN, lapiz lazuli leaves of wisdom hung thick with fruits, which is sweet to the sight, and also SAR, vegetables suitable for eating, and there were also the 3 brilliant green ME.LAM, the sacred records, which are the emerald and sapphire scroll of eternal life placed in the middle chamber of KIN.GUB, INA-KIB.DU, the 3 blue sapphire ME.LAM of knowledge of DA.MIQ, agreeable and LEM.NU, disagreeable DAM.QATI, deeds."

-Malachi York: The Sumerian Bible (excerpt from Is Jesus GOD: pg. 22-23)

Certainly the above gibberish from York being past off to his followers as some Sumerian text, is nothing more than an excerpt from the book of the bible (Genesis 2:9).  To be clear; there are NO Sumerian texts containing what York has in the above, it's more of his literary deceptions.

 He goes on to quote his own anticipated book (which was never released):

 "So ENQI: NU.DIM.MUD of INA-ANUN.NAQI appointed NIN.TI, who through in-vitro fertilization pro-created ADAMU, homo sapien, an earthling to look like themselves, saurians, that is to look like INA-ANUN.NAQI, the results of the Adamites' cloning.  ENQI: NU.DIM.MUD and NIN.TI formed them, living as ZIKAR (male) and living as SIN.NIS (female) and called them collectively Adamites."

-Malachi York: The Sumerian Bible 

 Again, this is York's corruption of the biblical narratives of Genesis 1:27.  There does exist two Sumerian creation epics called, 𒀭𒂗𒆠  𒀭 𒊩𒌆 𒈤Enki and Ninmaḫ , as well as: 𒀭𒂗𒆠  𒀭 𒊩𒌆 𒄯 𒊕 Enki and Ninḫursag. These  texts were Sumerian creation myths describing the causes and methods of  the creation of humankind from clay.  These stories also explained the origins of several deformed versions of humans. However, what York wrote in the above, is not a translation, nor copy of the texts; refer to the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (eTCSL) to view full texts.

Although The Sumerian Bible, Sumerian Torah, The Unmasked Scroll of ENQIME (Enoch) and others previously mentioned, were never released, eventually parts did make their way into the Paa Taraq Neo-Nuwaupian literature, released by way of those still having access to publishing York's teachings.


Example:

"In every culture in this world of theirs, there creation seems to begin with what is formed or shaped but in fact the word they use is creation or create which if you look up creation simply means to grow.  All begins with that principle. So in each and very culture there is what they call an incarnation or manifestation from being. That original being would have to contain all that was manifested and male, female, and neuter. This also pertains to those things on a molecular scale. You have the first element on the periodical chart. The element of Hydrogen is first and then you have Helium second and so on, but without the initial atom or molecules you couldn't get to the 99th or now even the 114th element.  Accordingly you will find in every culture such as the beings such as the Egiptian Rashunaat Ogdoad and these are sea creature which is where the seamen came from. And in the Sumerian cult you have the DINNEER 'The Righteous Ones': U.SHAM.GAL ''Flying Serpents': INA.A.NUNNA.QI 'Those who came to earth in Fifties' and the DINGIR 'Righteous Ones of the Rocketship" who are genderless and manifest and become gender. This is the real principle of what they call ''god': Simply a German word that expresses divinity to them. God is neuter gender in that most manifest as male and female and many especially throughout the world where male and female exist.

-Malachi York: The Sumerian Bible

The above excerpt from the Sumerian Bible was later released in the Paa Taraaq series; The Master's Secrets: PAA ANUNNAQI and the Biblical and Quraanic Race series No. 50

It should be remembered that while York was in prison, he used the pseudonym Marduk, and then it became En.Mur.duq.Gal, we have letters from York verifying this. 

It was all based on whatever he himself was studying and/or learning. Think back to everything he ever taught.  The "school" excuse was to hide the fact that IN REALITY it was a "school" for HIM.  He said its what we needed, but in IN REALITY it was whatever HE studied.  He ran into problems with Egypt, which is why he never never truly expanded or elevated Egyptian history or language as he did with the façade of Islam and pseudo-Sumerian.

In the so-called Egyptian "school" (not Kemet) he never fully delved into it because he had no one to guide his pen = use their works.  York went into Nuwaupu because he had Amunnubi Rooakhptah guiding his pen. 

E.A. Wallis Budge guided his pen on Egypt.

Ahmad Deedat guided his pen for Islam and fighting the Christians.

Zecharia Sitchin guided his pen on pseudo-Sumerian doctrine.

A self professed being from another world possessing "76 trillion years of knowledge", would have no need for any earthly person (the masters) guiding his pen from earth. Anyone using logic, commonsense and reasoning; can demonstrate the silliness of the Nuwaupian doctrine via dignity and grace. 

For example: Here's the gist of their book "Genetic Kiss", it says that genes are altered through contact with mates [wife/girlfriend] etc. This is how women become "slaves" to men etc. through sex and kissing etc. 

If York and the Nuwaupians truly believes that; then they have to explain via genetics why the women that York had sex with York, turned on him; if body fluid exchanges effects the core of genes etc., then the women in York's life should have been 100% loyal to this day.

During the court trial of York, two of his main office workers and sex partners; one being a minor when she gave birth to a son; Habiybah Washington, and Ginger Chang; his former part-time chauffeur mentioned that York would dictate, and that they would write what he felt the content of a book should be.  Then they would do ALL of the work on the books; adding pictures, plagiarizing, copying, pasting etc., obviously the so-called "genetic Kiss" didn't work on them, nor the others who testified at trial.

Q. Habiybah, how would you describe your relationship with him? Were there responsibilities that you did for him? 

Habiybah Washington: I worked in the mail room, I worked on the books, the regular.  It was books explaining our religion, what we believed, and didn't, historical, biblical stories, stuff like that.

Q. Who's ideas were these?

Habiybah Washington: It was his ideas, I mean some of it, we would type from other books but it was his ideas. He would dictate, we would type.

-Habiybah Washington January 12, 2004 Federal Court Testimony

Q. What did you do in the office?

Ginger Chang: I started doing the books, at the time we were doing the 5 books of Moses and I helped with it, I helped with doing the Revelation, re-translating (El's Injiyl).

Q. Were there others in the office that worked on those type of books?

Ginger Chang: Yes there were a lot of people too who worked on other types of books.

Q. During the time you worked on the books, and the other office duties, did you receive a salary?

Ginger Chang: No.

-Jin Hee Bae (Ginger Chang) January 12, 2004 Federal Court Testimony

 Naturally when York began work on his updated pseudo-Sumerian theology, he began embracing legitimate mainstream Sumerian language specialists, one being John A. Halloran. The Sumerian Bible was to plagiarize parts of Halloran's book, Sumerian Lexicon, and York decided what he would falsify, corrupt, and fit definitions to match Sitchin's interpretations, and attribute them to Halloran.  

Let's view the evidence.

In York's book Is Jesus GOD? pg. 16-17, he wrote that the word TI.RIG was a "...Sumerian word meaning 'to shine or to be bright' and he claimed that this word is found in "The Sumerian Lexicon by John A. Halloran page 64"

 This is false, we checked each volume of Halloran's Sumerian Lexicons and that word does NOT exist in his book. The Sumerian word to shine/bright is, 𒄩 𒀜 ha-ad, (to be) bright; to shine.

Then there's another Sumerian word;𒊕 𒊬𒊬 saĝ mu2-mu2 "to shine". Either way, York purposely mislead his followers. I contacted Halloran personally concerning the comments written by York, and he wrote this in response:

"I don't find anything like that "

Halloran rejected York's ti.rig claim, neither can this word be found in any Sumerian text, why; because York made it up and claimed that it's in Halloran's book, when it's NOT.

  York continues the deception his by claiming;

"They did not know what Rab meant then it went from Rabbi to Raboni; the original word Rabbi, the original word taken from the Sumerian word RIB.BA and means 'supreme or enormous' as found on page 133 of the Sumerian Lexicon by John A. Halloran, and comes from the word Rib meaning 'To be higher in rank; to go away'; or Al to El or Elohyeem to Eloh of which all forms of this word is from the Sumerian language which is also found in the Sumerian Lexicon by John A. Halloran on page 19 as lli meaning 'to raise or to set up'. It also appears as 'ila, ili. il, or al to be high', or 'to shine', or Yahayyu to Yahweh. This is from the Sumerian word HE, which means 'let it be' or the word HE.AM 'so be it' on page 101 of the Sumerian Lexicon by John A. Halloran".

-Malachi York: Is Jesus GOD? pg. 35

Halloran's Sumerian Lexicon page 120 does contain the word (/ri-ba/) from /rib/ however, it's an Akkadian loan word; 𒊑 𒁀 (/ri-ba/) meaning "to be surpassing, outstanding" < 𒊏 𒁍𒌋  rabû = to be big, great.  York clearly was unaware that there are many Akkadian loan words in the Sumerian language that resulted from the Sumerian renaissance (, which came about after being conquered by the Akkadians (post Sargonic), then later the Gutians.

Refer to  V. V. Emelianov's Akkadian Loanwords in Sumerian revised: page 486

𒃞 𒊑 𒁀 Men-ri-ba; (men-rib-ba) supreme crown (crown' + 'supreme) enormous, supreme in (Akkadian rab-bu), also found on page 120 of Halloran's book, nothing in this definition connects rib-ba with a Rabbi, that's more speculation versus evidence.

 In reality, the word rib (as in bones in the human body) in the Sumerian language is the word 𒍜𒋾 uzu-ti (/ti/) "rib" (uzu is the determinative not to be pronounced). In Akkadian it's𒍢 𒇻 şilu, no connections to Rab/Rabbi/Rabboni, York was wrong again. 

Assyriologist: Professor Samuel N. Kramer explains the meaning behind the name 𒍜𒋾{uzu} TI. 

"The Sumerian word for 'rib' is ti (pronounced 'tee'). The goddess created for the healing of Enki's rib, therefore was called in Sumerian Nin-ti, 'the lady of the rib.' But the very same Sumerian word ti also means 'to make live.' The name 𒊩𒌆𒋾 Nin-ti may thus mean 'the lady who makes live,' as well as 'the lady of the rib.' In Sumerian literature, therefore, 'the lady of the rib' came to be identified with 'the lady who makes live' through what might be termed a play on words." 

-Samuel Kramer, Sumerian Mythologies: pg. 103

The eTCSL has several passages featuring Nin-Ti, one example is the following.

The Enki and Ninhursaja transliteration tablet, lines 264-281. 

264. cec-ju10 a-na-zu a-ra-gig zi-ju10 ma-gig

265. dna-zi im-ma-ra-an-/tu\-[ud]

266. cec-ju10 a-na-zu a-ra-gig a2-ju10 ma-/gig\

267. da2-zi-mu2-a im-ma-ra-an-/tu\-[ud]

268. cec-ju10 a-na-zu a-ra-gig ti-ju10 ma-[gig]

269. dnin-ti im-ma-ra-an-[tu-ud]

270. cec-ju10 a-na-zu a-ra-gig zag-ju10 [ma-gig]

271. den-sa6-ag im-ma-ra-an-[tu-ud]

272. di4-di4-la2-la2 ba-tud-de3-en-na-ac nij2-/ba nam\-[la2]

273. dab-u2 lugal u2 he2-a

274. dnin-siki-la2 en ma2-gan-na he2-a

275. dnin-giri17-u3-tud dnin-a-zu ha-ba-an-tuku-tuku

276. dnin-ka-si nij2 cag4 si he2-a

277. dna-zi u3-mu-un-dar-a ha-ba-an-tuku-tuku

278. da2-zi-[mu2-a] [dnin]-jic-zid-da ha-ba-an-tuku-tuku

279. d/nin\-/ti/ (nin) itid-e he2-a

280. [den-sa6]-/ag\ en dilmun-na he2-a

281. [den-ki] za3-mi2

"...Where do you still feel much pain, dearest? What hurts you?' ' My mouth hurts me.' Ninhursag kissed Enki in the mouth. ' To the goddess Ninkasi I have given birth for you to set your mouth free. What hurts you still, dear?' ' My throat hurts me.' ' To the goddess Azimua I have given birth for you to set your throat free. What hurts you still, dear?'' ' My limbs hurt me'. ' To the god Enshag I have given birth for you to set your limbs free.

What hurts you most, dearest? ' My rib hurts me.' ' To the goddess Nin-ti, the Lady of the Rib and the One who makes Live, I have given birth for you to set your rib free. As soon as Ninhursag uttered the last sentence, Enki felt no pain or ache, revitalized and stronger than ever..."

-Transliteration and Translations from Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (eTCSL)

commentary by Bottéro and Samuel Kramer 1989:

In York's book Is Jesus GOD? in several places uses he uses a NEW word "Enqime", something York has never used before; not until he studied Sitchin, (one of the Masters who guided his pen).  York spreads Sitchin's pseudo-linguistic by taking from his writings The Lost Book of Enki: Memoirs and Prophecies of an Extraterrestrial God, where he combines the name Enki (EA), with that of /me/;a me was known as one of the decrees of the Anuna, York (following Sitchin with no evidence) deceptively labeled the word to be the name Enoch of the bible.

 " Irid: The biblical Jared; father of Enkime (the biblical Enoch)..."

-Zecharia Sitchin: The Lost Book of Enki: Memoirs and Prophecies of an Extraterrestrial God page 475

"That is walk and talk with the Neteraat, or Bible Elohyeem 'Gods', judges Angels' just as ENQIME, Khanuwk, Idriys (Enoch) did in Genesis..."

-Malachi York: Is Jesus GOD? pg. 28  

NO such word "ENQIME occurs in Sumerian literature.

Here are examples of York's poor scholarship, and false Sumerian language claims. On page fifteen he brings in a word "Aduaba".

- Page 15  "...which she in turn persuaded her husband Kadmon, Zakar, ADABA (Adam) 

NO such word occurs in Sumerian literature.

 - Page 15 "...in the middle of the enclosed KIN.GUB (Gan) of delight in E.DIN Eden beneath the tree."

The building of Ninĝirsu's temple (Gudea, cylinders A and B) Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (eTCSL)

 - Page 17  "Now knowing DA.MIQ 'good' and LEM.NU 'evil', which is a symbolic tree at the roots of the pyramid. 

This is a complete lie!

- Page 23 "the 3 blue sapphire ME.LAM of knowledge of DA.MIQ..."

This can't be found in any Sumerian text.

 Conclusion:

I have presented several examples of York altering words and their meanings to fit within his theology, I strongly suggest to anyone that accepts York's teachings, to check  them CLOSE!  Verify, go over them with a fine tooth comb, this is necessary because York and his followers have a very long history of deceptions such as these presented in this article. York played on the ignorance of his followers who were clueless on anything related to Mesopotamia.  So he could use Sitchin as a teaching tool, and along the way, add in anything, which would go completely over the heads of the followers; or anyone not familiar with Sumerian or Akkadian languages. The following quote; I feel is appropriately placed here.

"About 350 BC, the Greek philosopher Aristotle classified the spider as having six legs. And for the  next 20 centuries everyone believed the spider had six legs. No one even bothered to count. After all, who would dare challenge the great Aristotle?  Well, along came Lamarck (1744-1829), the outstanding biologist and naturalist. He carefully counted the legs of the spider. And guess how many legs he counted? Exactly eight! The myth that had been taught for centuries was destroyed because Lamarck bothered to count."

 Nuwaupians: start fact-checking York's every word, or continue to fall victim to his years of literary deception.